Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Yellowstone in Pictures

I have always been a fan of Ansel Adams' work.  His photographs transcend language.  The majesty of the landscape is captured with each shutter flick.
Adams was commissioned by the National Parks Service in 1941 to create a photographic mural that would depict the land protected by the parks.    These murals would be used to decorate the walls of a new building to house the Department of the Interior. The project was halted at the beginning of WWII and was never revisited. 
Adams' photographs depict his love of landscape.  No other photographer has captured the beauty of our country the way that Adams did.  The viewer can actually feel Adams' adoration coming through the photograph.  While in Yellowstone, Adams captured iconic images of Old Faithful as well as many other profound images throughout the park.  While viewing them, one can see "precisely there does it have the certain character of god." (Momaday 210.)
 Adams dedicated his life to the environment and the preservation of natural landscapes.  He became a member of the Sierra Club at the young age of seventeen and remained a member throughout his life.  He served on the board for over 30 years.
   Adams is best known for his work in Yosemite National Park.  He first visited the park as a child where his father gave him a camera to record the trip.  It is at this point where Adams became enamored with photography and  became an ardent student of the craft.
The following photograph by Adams is labeled Tetongs and the Snake River .   When I view this piece I am reminded that "there is a perfect freedom in the mountains, but it belongs to the eagle and the elk, the badger and the bear." (Momaday 210.)
No other artist captured the American West in photograph like Ansel Adams.  At the time of his death in 1984, Adams was considered the Master of photography.

Work Cited
www.archives.gov/research/ansel-adams/ info
www.fotos.org
www.iamjapanese.tumblr.com
Momaday, N. Scott " ‘Introduction’ from The Way to Rainy Mountain" 1968.
The Literary West; An Anthology of Western American Literature
www.research.archives.gov/description/519993
www.wildernessventures.com

. Ed. Thomas J. Lyon Oxford, Oxford University Press. 208-213. Print

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Brides


    In July of 1918, Hallie Crawford Stillwell was a self described “ nervous bride- to- be and twenty years old.” (Stillwell 104.)    I too, was 20 when I married.  I know how a young woman of that age feels when she is about to marry.  Young brides-to-be are excited about the future they will share with their future husband; the life they will create for themselves and the lives they create as they have children.  I know, I remember. 

   The brides- to- be of years past worried more about the marriage than the wedding.  My grandmother worried about earning enough money to buy a dress, not so much about how she would look in it.  I don’t doubt that she ,in fact, did want to be radiant in that dress, but I know she didn’t starve herself to get into it.   She was a product of harder times after all, she had been hungry most of her life, she wasn’t looking to emphasize that hunger for a dress.  Like Stillwell, my grandmother’s thoughts were of her future and making the best life possible for herself and the man she loved.   The whole idea was us not  me or “How do I look?” 


  Stillwell wondered “what (her) role as a pioneer ranch wife would be like.” (Stillwell 108.)  She would do all of the cooking, washing, and child rearing.  Her life would be filled with challenge and hardship, joy and hard work.  Stillwell remembers how she “was ready to accept my responsibilities as his wife…” (Stillwell 113.) 

 Today’s bride is much different. Today planning a wedding is time consuming, stressful, exhaustive, and expensive. Recently the web has been buzzing with the story of Feeding Tube Brides. According to Click2Houston.com, today’s future brides are paying $1,500.00 to have a feeding tube inserted. This devise administers an 800 calorie per day liquid diet that consists of a combination of protein, fat and no carbohydrates. In the span of a week, brides- to -be can lose up to 10 pounds or more. Gone are the days of radiant brides. They have been replaced by gaunt, wan, hungry women walking around with tubes hanging out of their noses. Most of these women gain all the weight back during their honeymoon.
   

More important than the question “What are these women thinking?” is the question “What are the future husbands thinking?” Equal portions of blame can be placed on the grooms in this bizarre feeding tube scenario. Husbands are expected to shelter their wives from the certain things, in my opinion. A voluntary feeding tube is one of those things. Stillwell knew that her husband “would protect me from danger and teach me how to protect myself.”(Stillwell 113.) One must wonder who is protecting today’s bride.




Works Cited
Barbadoro, Alexandria. “I’ll Take my Enema Now.” April 24, 2012. Web. April 26, 2012. <http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2012/04/24/enema-shop-open-business/>
Berman, Laura. “Is a Feeding Tube now a New Brides Best Friend? April 24, 2012. Web. April 26, 2012. <http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/easy/12012285-423/is-feeding-tube-now-a-brides-best-friend.html>
Chung, Jen.  “The Feeding Tube Diet.” Food. April 22, 2012. Web. April 26, 2012. <http://gothamist.com/2012/04/22/feeding_tube_diet_bride_its_not_cra.php>
“Feeding Tube Diet gains popularity with Brides.” April 17, 2012. Web. April 26, 2012. <http://www.click2houston.com/news/-Feeding-Tube-Diet-gains-popularity-with-brides/-/1735978/10959300/-/9rng42z/-/index.html>
<http://fashion-mommy.com>
<http://fashion-era.com>












Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Life on the Res

   While reading "Lost Sister" by Dorothy Johnson I became curious about of few topics as they relate to the Native American existence, namely poverty levels and the education of those living on Indian Reservations.
   Native Americans endure the highest poverty levels when compared to other ethnic groups.   Native Americans living on larger reservations experience poverty rates of 40% or higher.  One in every four Native Americans live in poverty (25.3%).  The average annual income among Native Americans is $33,627.00.
   Not all Indians receive income generated by casinos.  In fact, many reservations are remotely located and therefore do not have casinos as they are not ideal locations for any type of business.   These somewhat  isolated locations also contribute to poverty as it is often times not economically feasible to travel the long distances from the reservations to areas that provide employment.   Therefore, Native Americans experience the highest rate of unemployment.  In certain instances, the unemployment rate among Native Americans is triple that of the Great Depression.  Fewer Native Americans have full-time employment than any other community that experiences high poverty levels.  Only 36% of Native American males experience employment year round.  Counties that contain Reservations are among the poorest counties in the country.
   In terms of education the Native American does not fair well.  90% of Native Americans attend high school, however the drop out rate is the highest of any other ethnic minority.  Performance drops drastically after the fourth grade.  The national graduation rate among Native Americans is approximately 50%. 
 Among the reasons given for drop out are:
* As a Native American, school is not important.
* My teacher does not understand me.
* Little to no parental support

  Native Americans fall glaringly behind African Americans in college enrollment and graduation.  According to the National Educational Longitudinal Survey, the United States Education System ministered to a mere 1.4% of Native Americans, making them the second most disadvantage ethnic group.
   The statement made by the Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Kevin Gover said it best during a speech given at the 175th Anniversary celebration of the establishment of the Bureau held on September 8, 2000,  when he said "This agency forbade the speaking of Indian languages, prohibited the conduct of traditional religious activities, outlawed traditional government, and made Indian people ashamed of who they were. Worst of all, the Bureau of Indian Affairs committed these acts against children entrusted to its schools, brutalizing them emotionally, psychologically, physically, and spiritually.  Even in this era of self -determination, when the Bureau of Indian Affairs is at long last serving as an advocate for Indian people in an atmosphere of mutual respect, the legacy of these misdeeds haunts us. The trauma of shame, fear and anger has passed from one generation to the next, and manifests itself in the rampant alcoholism, drug abuse, and domestic violence that plague Indian country. Many of our people live lives of unrelenting tragedy as Indian families suffer the ruin of lives by alcoholism, suicides made of shame and despair, and violent death at the hands of one another. So many of the maladies suffered today in Indian country result from the failures of this agency. Poverty, ignorance, and disease have been the product of this agency's work....".

Works Cited

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Tossed

   While watching Crying Indian recently I saw scenes of modernization mixed with visions from times passed.  I thought of Fort Worth.  I was struck by the idea that society's ever growing desire to have more has killed what we once were.  Our History is important.  Where we are from shapes where we will go.  Fort Worth is the personification of this ideal.  We were once rugged cattle raising settlers, some of us still are.  The years have passed and the people who call Fort Worth home still hold tightly the belief that we are rugged pioneer men and women.  Fort Worth is where the west began.  Cattlemen driving their herds up the Chisholm Trail stopped in Fort Worth as it was the last stop before crossing the Red River into Indian Territory.  They stopped here in Fort Worth, the last place to get supplies and rest before entering the unknown enviornment of the West.
   Four million head of cattle came through Fort Worth between 1866 and 1890, a fact that brought rise to the moniker "Cowtown."  The arrival of the railroad in 1876 made Fort Worth a major shipping point for cattle and other livestock.  The Union Stockyards company needed funds to keep the stockyards thriving so a Boston business man by the name of Greenleif Simpson was brought to Fort Worth in hopes that he would invest.  Simpson was so impressed with what he saw he contacted fellow entrepreneurs and  in 1893 together they bought the Union stock and formed Fort Worth Stockyards Company.
   The company soon realized that it would be much more profitable to process the meat locally rather than ship it out for processing.  Armour and Company and Swift and Company were both persuaded to come to Fort Worth and open meat packing plants.  The decision of where each company would be built was decided by a coin toss.  Armour and Company won that toss and decided to build their plant on the northern site, leaving the southern site for Swift and Company.  Construction began in 1902 and both plants officially opened in 1903.
   The population of the city tripled within the ten years of the arrival of Amour and Swift.  Due to the benefits and salaries offered, Fort Worth was flooded with workers.  Many were immigrants who came to Texas through the Galveston port. 
   The Swift plant was thought to be better plant of the two.  The founder of Swift and Company, Gustavus Swift was the inventor of the refrigerated rail car.  His plant was highly insulated by double brick walls which ensured meat freshness.
   The Fort Worth Stockyards was the largest livestock market in the world in 1917, the height of World War I.  During World War II over 5,000,000,000 head of livestock were sold or processed. By 1986 only 57,181 animals were sold in the Fort Worth Stockyards. 
   There has been much discussion regarding the decline of the Fort Worth Stockyards.  Most historians agree that the trucking industry and the interstate highway project were the major contributors to the death of the meat packing industry in Fort Worth.  The advantage of shipping in bulk became less appealing when compared to lower cost of trucking.  Further more, consumers began to demand specialty cuts of meat over the factory style meats produced by both Armour and Company and Swift and Company.
    The Armour plant officially closed in 1962, followed by the close of the Swift plant in 1971.  Over the years the once regal and innovative plants have fallen to ruin and destruction.  The 18 acre site of the Armour plant was purchased by Chesapeake Energy in 2007.  The company had plans to drill on the site.  Those plans have changed.  The site is now planned to be sold for redevelopment.  Kimberly Britton, the director of community relations for Chesapeake said, " We looked at the buildings to see if they might be salvaged, but they were in such horrible condition that we realized that we wouldn't be able to restore them."
   The fate of the Swift and Company plant is just as depressing.  The Swift site is fenced and covered in graffiti.  It appears as though it has been bombed.
  The Stockyards Museum website states that "Many thousands of head of cattle are still sold in the stockyards every week via video/satelite sales..."
  Gone are the days of herds taken up the Chisholm Trail.  Gone are the days of Fort Worth being the last stop before the expanse of the West.  The meat packing industry that served as the heart of Fort Worth industry for so many years has been tossed, just like that coin so many years ago.
  
 
Works Cited

“A History of the Fort Worth Stockyards” Stockyards Museum. 2009. Web. February 20, 2012. 
Image also provided from site.

Steve Campbell. “Historic Fort Worth Stockyards meatpacking plant will be demolished.” Fort Worth Star Telegram. November 07, 2011. February 20, 2012.

Lyndsay Knecht Milne. “Shells of our City:Swift and Company Packing Plant.” NBCDFW.com. August 21, 2009. February 20, 2012. http://www.nbcdfw.com/the-scene/real-estate/Shlee-Swift-and-Co-Packing-Plant-5322244

James Brandon, 2010. The Annexation of Niles City [database on-line] (Google Images, accessed February 21, 2012) available http://www.hdrspotting.com/HDRPhotoSpot/16767

Tavo. 2010.  The Meddling Misfits [database on-line] (Google Images, accessed February 21, 2012) available <http://meddlingmisfits.blogspot.com>